|
|
Private Mortgage Loans Present A Short-Term Financing Substitute
Private mortgage loans are made by private lenders instead of customary financing foundations such as banks, lending institutions, or government organizations. They typically are short-term (6 months to 3 years) hard money or asset-based loans, and the decision to lend is based on the fairness and significance of the property being put up as collateral, not on the borrower's credit.
These loans are a source of funding for trained real estate investors who wish to obtain, re-establish, or cash out equity of income producing property, and those who otherwise would not qualify for conventional financing. Private mortgages also help real estate investors who need urgent financing without the financial certification required by traditional institutional financiers.
Private mortgage loans are very secure because they signify a maximum of 65 percent to 70 percent of the evaluated value of income producing possessions. On non-income producing property, a maximum of 55 percent loan to value is lent. Investors can look forward to pay interest rates of 12 percent to 14 percent on first liens and 16 percent to 18 percent on second liens in this current low interest rate situation. Historically, first lien yield of six points over major has been available.
Why Borrow Private Currency?
When interest rates of 14 percent to 18 percent are additional to four to eight points, the borrower is paying more than 20 percent yearly for a private mortgage loan. This is a good deal for private mortgage lenders, but why would borrowers desire to pay these high rates when conservative mortgages range between 7 percent and 10 percent? Many causes exist, but all fall into four groups.
Speed of Closing
Conservative mortgages usually take between 45 days and 90 days to fund, since institutional lenders need to obtain an appraisal of the property's value, perform a detailed examination of the borrower's credit history, and thoroughly evaluate the borrower's current financial status. On the other hand, private mortgage lenders usually can complete a deal within seven to 10 days. Since the property itself is the main criteria used to determine loan eligibility, less information on the borrower is required, resulting in a much quicker approval procedure.
The private mortgage lender is protected by lending at a significantly lower LTV ratio: 65 percent vs. 80 percent to 90 percent for institutional lenders. Further, the private mortgage lender can make a decision within 24 hours of receiving information, whereas institutional mortgage money must be approved by a loan committee that may meet only twice a month.
Easy Application Procedure
While a borrower's lack of up-to-date personal financial information would work against or at least delay approval for an institutional mortgage, it should have no result on the ability to attain a private mortgage loan. Private mortgage lenders generally base their resolutions on the asset used for collateral -- the property. If the property value is high enough and the income being generated from it is satisfactory to pay the interest on the debt, the borrower's personal financial situation should not affect the private mortgage lender's verdicts.
Other Money Resources Are Not Obtainable
A borrower may not be eligible for an institutional credit loan for reasons ranging from low borrower credit scores or too much borrower debt. Further, the goods it may not sustain the type of loan the borrower wants: Many institutional lenders will not loan sums under $500,000 and will not lend second lien money even if there is important equity in the property.
In these cases private mortgage lenders may be the only accessible resource. Institutional lenders are concerned with both the estimate value of the property and borrower and property credit; however, private mortgage lenders are concerned only with the assess value, as long as it represents a fair market price. Hence, if a property is producing or can produce sufficient income to pay the note and the value of the property will provide adequate equity, the borrower's credit is not an issue for the private mortgage lender.
More Funds Accessible
Since private mortgage lenders base loans on the appraised value of the assets, the borrower may be able to borrow more and therefore have less of its own capital invested in the property. In these instances, the borrower is not punishing for purchasing a property at a noteworthy discount to market value.
Investment parameter
The most vital parameter private mortgage lenders think when evaluating a loan request is LTV ratio. They characteristically will lend up to 50 percent on raw land or not fully formed property; 65 percent on marketable income producing property such as office buildings, shopping centers, and warehouses; and 70 percent on multifamily income property such as residence complexes. The greatest amount usually will be lent if all criteria are met; lower amounts may be lent if the loan or borrower is considered less than best.
The second parameter is the type of material goods to lend on, which often is determined by the ease in disposing of the property in case of non-payment obviously, a single-use property that would take a year to sell is less attractive than a multi-tenant, income manufacturing office building.
The third investment parameter is the cash flow or income possible of the property put up as collateral. Although many private mortgage lenders are broadminded in this area, the monthly interest payments must come from somewhere. If the property is constructing a cash flow after all everyday expenditure, the property income alone may cover the monthly payments without the borrower having to come out of pocket. This adds a great degree of safety to the note. Cash flow from other income properties also can replace for cash flow from the property being sited as security.
The fourth major investment parameter the lender must think is exit policy, or how the borrower plans to repay the loan. Since most private mortgage loans are short-term, private mortgage lenders have a keen interest in examining whether a exacting exit strategy is workable. For example, if the exit tactic is to refinance the property, the lender must decide if the credit score of the borrower is high enough to be eligible for a long-term mortgage, if the property cash flow is adequate to cover the debt payments, and if the property will meet the universal criteria set up by the mortgage lenders most likely to refinance the assets.
| |
